In every screenwriting class, you are going to learn about many rules. However, the most important one is always the same: give the story energy to keep the viewers engaged. Keeping an audience entertained is, after all, the entire purpose of a story.
However, everyone who has ever tried to write a script will have found themselves in a position where maintaining a constant engaging narrative that relates to the audience and has a logical flow to it is hard work.
Thankfully, there are some tricks and tips that can help writers out in such situations. In this article, we will be looking at the “but and therefore” rule. This is a method to ensure energy, continuation, and connection in a script.
To understand this rule and ensure a good grasp of how to use it we will follow three steps:
- Identifying how the rule works and why it should be used.
- How it has been used in the past by other writers.
- How this will help in your own writing.
Table of Contents
- The “But and Therefore” Rule
- The But and Therefore Rule Throughout Time
- Examples of the But and Therefore Rule in Literature and Their Film Adaptations
- The But and Therefore Rule’s Complexity
- In Conclusion
The “But and Therefore” Rule
Most screenwriters themselves get stuck at some point or another during the screenwriting process. From writers who create scenes on a spur of a moment act at 2 am when inspiration strikes them, to screenwriters who meticulously plan out each step of their script, everyone hits a wall at some point in their writing.
The same happened to professional screenwriters Trey Parker and Matt Stone, best known for South Park. When they hit their first success with South Park, they soon felt the pressure to live up to the hype. But when they had to develop more brilliant episodes they found themselves stuck.
So, the question was how to get out of this writer’s block and keep an engaging narrative. This is where the “but and therefore” rule comes into the story.
What is the But and Therefore Rule?
The rule consists of a simple approach of replacing the words “and then” with “but and therefore” in a story.
Here is a simple example to convey the idea.
- “James goes out for a run, and then it rains, and then he goes swimming, and his ex-girlfriend is there, and then he goes home.”
- What the rule does for us is to turn this boring event into a more exciting journey through James’ day by simply utilizing the but and therefore rule…
- “James goes out for a run, but it is raining; therefore, he goes swimming. But his ex-girlfriend is at the swimming pool, therefore he hurries home.”
As this example shows, the simple use of but and therefore creates tension and helps create a flow of circumstances and consequences in the narrative structure. The events that take place suddenly aren’t happening because of the writer’s desire. They happen due to a chain reaction from what happened previously in the story.
Why Use the But and Therefore Rule?
So the rule is a great trick to prevent writer’s block during the production of a script. Whenever there is a new event in the story, you can simply think of an obstacle that can come in the way of what the character wants. As a consequence, the character makes a decision or action to work through that challenge.
This can also help avoid dull and passive stories. In the process of writing a story, most people fall into the routine of writing in a list format. They write as if they were preparing an essay rather than a piece of entertainment.
Even though this makes a story clear, it is not always a useful approach as it dulls down the narrative structure and can leave the viewer uninterested after a few scenes. Parker and Stone’s approach facilitates achieving a lively and entertaining story. By creating obstacles to the character’s dramatic wants and forcing them to come up with clever solutions in order to achieve their goal, they produce an exciting story the audience wants to take part in.
The But and Therefore Rule Throughout Time
Even though Parker and Stone defined the rule with a name and a clear explanation, the rule can be traced back to thousands of stories many years before the South Park creators gave it a name.
To avoid the feeling that events happen in random order and out of nowhere during a story without a cause or consequence, writers have needed techniques to help create a logical story flow where one point connects to the other.
To identify the indirect use of the but and therefore rule we are going to look at some examples. Specifically, let’s look at famous pieces of literature that have their own film adaptations. These examples prove how the but and therefore is essential to all forms of storytelling, not just screenwriting and not just South Park episodes.
Examples of the But and Therefore Rule in Literature and Their Film Adaptations
Romeo + Juliet
- Romeo and Juliet fall in love after their first meeting.
- BUT their families are rivals.
- THEREFORE they can not be together.
Moreover, the rule is also used during specific events.
- Romeo finds Juliet, BUT she is dead.
- THEREFORE he decides to kill himself.
- BUT Juliet was still alive.
- THEREFORE she wakes up to find her lover dead and kills herself due to the grief.
Every event is connected to the previous one via the use of the but and therefore rule. The narrative is consequential, each strand of the plot leading to another.
- Harry discovers that he is a wizard and goes to study at Hogwarts School of witchcraft and wizardry.
- BUT then he learns that a dark wizard called Voldemort is after him.
- THEREFORE, he must find a way to defeat him.
If we want to take a look at a more specific event, then the Halloween feast is a great example.
- During Halloween at Hogwarts, a Troll enters the castle. The professors instruct Harry to go to his dormitory.
- BUT his friend Hermione is missing.
- THEREFORE, he defies the rules and goes looking for her.
In this example, the but and therefore rule prompts Harry into action. This is vital to the agency he has as a protagonist. Harry is a protagonist that is right at the heart of the action at all times. And it’s consequently vital that he’s thrust into this action in a believable and logical manner.
The But and Therefore Rule’s Complexity
The examples above provide a very clear and simple understanding of the rule’s usage. However, the above examples are also relatively straightforward and uncomplicated.
What happens if a writer wants to create a more complex story with a narrative arc that is not in chronological order? How would the causes and consequences that this rule establishes be incorporated in a story where the first scene we see does not directly connect to the scene that follows?
Let’s analyze the rule in two famously non-chronological films and prove the but and therefore rule’s wide-ranging applicability.
Memento follows a man who suffers from anterograde amnesia and is trying to hunt down a man who, he believes, killed his wife. Due to his amnesia, he resorts to tattooing important information on his body in order to remember it after each blackout.
- The narrative begins with a scene in color, which is supposed to be the end of the story.
- Right after that, it switches to a scene in black and white, which is supposed to be the beginning of the story.
- The scenes in color are running in reversed order while everything in black and white runs in chronological order.
- The narrative then continues to jump from colorful scenes (the events at the end) to black-and-white scenes (the start). Until, finally, they collide at one point.
The But and Therefore Rule in this Timeline
Consequently, how does the but and therefore rule apply to this narrative that mixes scenes that do not directly correlate to each other? Well, the rule is there but the viewer must do a bit of detective work to find it.
If we take the first two scenes we see, we won’t find a correlation. The film starts with the main character, Leonard, taking a polaroid picture of a man who he then shoots (scene in color). Then we jump to Leonard waking up in a motel room (scene in black and white). From these two scenes, we don’t have a direct use of the rule. If we tried to apply the rule now it would not make much sense.
- Leonard takes a polaroid picture.
- BUT then he shoots a man.
- THEREFORE, he wakes up in a motel room.
That has little continuity.
Still, when we start to go deeper into the movie, the scenes will start to connect. The third scene of the movie (a scene in color) shows Leonard with another man (Teddy) going to a warehouse. When they arrive Leonard reads from one of his polaroids a message saying he needed to kill the man. Thus, he shoots Teddy. So, here we have our first connection using our rule.
- Leonard goes to a warehouse with Teddy.
- BUT he reads a message with an order to kill him.
- THEREFORE, Leonard kills Teddy, which is what we saw happen in the first scene.
The third scene we see is the one that gives us the context for what happens in the first. On that account, the rule applies, we just needed to wait to understand which scenes connected to create the causes (but) and consequences (therefore).
This final example again has a more complex narrative structure than the first two films analyzed above. It does not have a typical chronological structure. However, it is not quite as complicated as Memento.
- Pulp Fiction follows the story of a series of incidents that happen during the course of three interrelated stories, each one with its own protagonist.
- The narrative is constructed in seven different sequences that don’t originally connect with each other.
- Though, as we saw happened with Memento, the sequences will relate to each other after gaining more context throughout the film.
During the first scene, (the first sequence) two of the main characters, Vincent and Jules, have breakfast at a diner, with a suitcase.
- Suddenly, two robbers enter the diner. The sequence that follows is of Vincent and Jules driving in a car to an apartment complex. Inside one of the apartments, a violent scene takes place when they try to take the suitcase from some people.
- This culminates in a shooting, followed by Vincent accidentally shooting a character inside their car.
So, how did we get from sequence A to sequence B? Let’s try to apply our rule…
The But and Therefore Rule in This Timeline
- Vincent and Jules are at a diner with a suitcase
- BUT two robbers enter the restaurant.
- THEREFORE, they are driving to an apartment complex to retrieve the suitcase, and accidentally kill someone inside their car.
The rule could make sense in this written context. But, seeing the sequences on screen, we know that the connection the rule tries to establish does not correlate logically with these scenes.
However, what happens if we include sequence C? Sequence C is actually the sixth episode in the film, and it shows the aftermath of the accidental death of the character in sequence B. Here Vincent and Jules are trying to get rid of the body of the person they accidentally shot. Taking this new information into consideration the rule can apply to unify sequences B and C.
- Vincent and Jules drive to the apartment and initiate a shooting.
- BUT they accidentally kill someone in their car.
- THEREFORE, they must get rid of the body.
Hence, the rule once again applies, continuity is created, and the story is interesting because there are causes and consequences in the events. In this context, the but and therefore rule proves vital in piecing together a complicated narrative structure, where it’s not always initially clear who we are following and why.
The but and therefore rule is one of the simpler screenwriting techniques to apply. At the same time, it is also particularly versatile. One can utilize the rule for complex narrative structures or for simple, chronological scenes.
Adopting this rule into your scriptwriting process is a great practice as it can get you out of a situation where you do not know what to write next. Furthermore, it will create a natural flow and energy for the story at hand. Removing “and then” with “but and therefore” is perhaps as easy as it gets in the hard and complicated process of creating a script.
Of course, that doesn’t mean that the natural answers will flow straight away. But this technique can be a key way to give your narrative the spine it needs to support a convincing and natural story. Ideally, it will set you on a path to creating the beats your audience needs to maintain engagement.
The but and therefore rule is really just a way of forcing you to ask why. Most importantly, why will the audience be compelled to watch and keep watching?
This article was written by Valentina Vlasich and edited by IS Staff.
Get *ALL* our FREE Resources
Tackle the trickiest areas of screenwriting with our exclusive eBooks. Get all our FREE resources when you join 60,000 filmmakers on our mailing list!