It’s almost hard to think of a modern film that doesn’t have a flashback example somewhere within it. Of course, that’s not strictly true. But it is true that flashbacks are a key part of a screenwriting arsenal.
Modern film and TV is full of flashback examples. Screenwriters and filmmakers will use them for a variety of reasons. Often it will be expositional, often it will be to add dynamism.
As audiences, we can usually tell when a flashback feels contrived or when it feels genuine and effective.
For a screenwriter, using flashbacks can be a very tempting way of making a screenplay more dynamic. But it’s important to hone in on why you are using a flashback.
In this article, we’re not going to look necessarily at movies that are entirely built around flashbacks or told from the perspective of a flashback (like Memento, Forest Gump or Titanic for example). Instead, we will look at flashback examples that feature briefly or intermittently throughout a screenplay.
They might just feature once, or they might crop up a couple of times. Furthermore, what flashback examples are innovative in how they use flashback?
Overall, we’ll demonstrate how best to use flashbacks to add to and accentuate your story.
A flashback is used in Ratatouille to hammer home the movie’s ultimate theme – the power of food to transport.
Our hero chef’s ratatouille transports the cynical and skeptical Anton Ego back to his childhood. One taste of the dish takes us to a flashback of his childhood. His mother’s cooking comforts him after he comes home in tears.
This tiny flashback encapsulates the movie’s themes in a brilliantly efficient way. It unlocks a previously closed off character and therefore unlocks a theme.
This flashback example brilliantly shows how flashbacks can compare and contrast the past with the present. The Godfather Part II shows the downfall of the Corleone family by contrasting it with its origins.
Flashbacks to the young Vito Corleone establishing himself in New York in the dawn of the 20th Century help give context to the Corleone family story. This helps bolster the themes of immigration, American capitalism and family at the core of The Godfather series.
Furthermore, a flashback at the very end of the movie helps give a devastating conclusion to the story. We see the family in happier times. Well, times where they are all together at least.
Moreover, we get a sense of the rifts that will ultimately tear the family apart.
This flashback ending exemplifies how to show the root cause of the conflicts that make up the story.
We see the same tensions and conflicts were always there. The very same that define the story we have just seen in the preceding two and a half hours.
Right from the start of Manchester by the Sea, flashback examples permeate the narrative. This feels almost disorientating at first. We’re not quite sure where we are initially, characters the same but different in different scenes.
The films gives a gradual picture of the protagonist‘s state through small pictures of his life at various points.
Flashbacks in this film don’t just explain the narrative but paint a complete picture of the protagonist‘s state of mind.
The film isn’t interested in holding the audience’s hand. It is interested in painting a realistic picture of grief.
The Safdie Brothers’ Good Time features a flashback that helps add some thrilling dynamism to the action.
It’s a brilliant break in the action, taking us on a whirlwind journey through one man’s story.
This is a flashback that sits at odds with the rest of the narrative, which doesn’t feature any other flashbacks. However, it makes sense as it is completely wrapped up in who this character, Ray, is.
It’s a style unique to him. This demonstrates how flashback can accentuate characterisation. It provides backstory but also hammers home a style that is unique and distinctive to that particular character.
Flashbacks feature in Fight Club most memorably in the movie’s devastating third act reveal. In explaining the film’s main premise, that the Narrator (Edward Norton) is Tyler Durden (Brad Pitt), flashbacks help ram this point home.
Often flashbacks to previous points in a movie feel patronising. They can feature as a way of triggering the audience’s memory, just in case they can’t put the pieces together on their own.
However, here in Fight Club, the flashbacks aren’t strictly callbacks.
These scenes are effective because they prove we’ve been tricked. They also seem disturbing, seeing The Narrator in full blown psychosis, inventing an imaginary friend and playing out this fantasy in the real world.
Flashbacks are almost taken to a whole new level of meaning in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.
The film’s concept is a brilliant way of exploring how we interact with our own memories.
Many films centred around a romance flash back and forward to show a contrast in the relationship at hand. However, in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, flashbacks have a whole new meaning and purpose. Their very conception as memories is interrogated.
Oldboy provides a flashback as a window into a character’s past trauma. This trauma will imminently prove to be their ultimate downfall.
Haunted by the traumatising image of letting a girlfriend fall to her death, Lee Woo-jin proceeds to kill himself in an elevator. It’s not the only reason he makes this decision. But seeing the flashback at this moment proves how defining it has been for him in his life.
Often in movies and TV, past and present versions of a character seem vastly different.
This flashback breaks down that myth. A flickering between past and present versions of Lee Woo-jin shows there isn’t necessarily a before and after, but instead always a present.
Flashbacks in The Crown almost feel necessary in exploring the vast history and backstory of the British Royal family.
Whilst we’re always with the Queen as time progresses linearly throughout the 20th Century, flashbacks prove vital in providing context and exposition.
Perhaps the most effective flashbacks are ones that illustrate Prince Phillip’s backstory.
The flashbacks in The Crown are a great example of how flashbacks can illustrate context.
Flashbacks help convey the vast, rich context that the Royal family exist and existed in. Even if it seems they live in an isolated world, illustrated context proves that to not be true.
Money Heist uses flashbacks to flesh out the backstory of how we reached the heist. It means that the tension of the heist is savoured in being spread out rather than condensed.
The titular heist is launched into in the first episode. After initially hearing it will take months to plan, this is at first a little disorienting. But soon we realise that this heist won’t be over anytime soon.
The flashbacks in this show are primarily a great way of elongating a story. A heist that could take place over the course of an episode or two (or a feature) is instead extended to a whole series. This proves to be an effective way of making each episode tense and nourishing.
A more linear approach might have audiences less engaged throughout, perhaps feeling that the excitement and tension of the heist can’t come soon enough.
This non-linear approach, utilising flashbacks, is in part what makes the show such so compelling and bingeworthy. There’s a balance in each episode, one that we can’t resist returning to again and again.
Kill Bill features a number of flashbacks. But perhaps none is a more memorable flashback example than O-Ren’s backstory.
Tarantino gives character exposition in a flashback rendered not in live action but in cartoon. This is an ode to the Japanese Anime inspirations for the film. But it’s also a brilliantly dynamic and different way of providing context and character backstory.
We’ve seen our fair share of action and violence already in the film. And we’re about to see a lot more imminently. By presenting action in a different way (via cartoon) Tarantino gives some much needed variety.
Most of all, however, in writing terms this is a compellingly told story. It’s full of myth, tragedy, violence and revenge.
Flashbacks only feature once in Marriage Story. However, when it rains it pours.
We don’t know these are strictly flashbacks until suddenly we find ourselves in the present.
This reveal is a touching jolt into the present. The flashbacks paint a picture of Charlie and Nicole’s relationship, one largely happy and affectionate and full of love. But now they’re getting divorced.
The sadness of this journey out of their relationship hits home immediately. We know what has been lost straight away.
There is an innovation to this opening sequence that is very effective. It’s a dynamic way of providing exposition and illustrating the story world. But it also sets up the stakes very well.
Less than ten minutes have passed but almost everything has been set up. Now we can spend the rest of the film analysing what went wrong and how/if they can move forward. Moreover, we can really let the emotion of the situation sink in.
Throughout Gilmore Girls, Lorelai’s young pregnancy and Rory’s birth is not much more than folklore. It’s the distant past. After all, by the time we meet Rory and Lorelai, Rory is sixteen. Her birth is a footnote to their story.
However, suddenly midway through season 3, the writers provide us with insight into the defining moment of Lorelai’s life. Fans of the show can revel in this moment. This moment is almost mythic in the Gilmore lore.
It’s a flashback that wouldn’t have been nearly as rewarding if done earlier in the series, where we don’t know the Gilmores so intimately.
Moreover, the flashbacks are subtly inserted into this episode. It’s not as if Lorelai is directly talking about this moment. Instead, we’re given insight into Lorelai’s mind, triggered as it is by another birth.
This episode ends on a touching moment of connection between Lorelai and her mother, Emily.
However, this isn’t explicit. It might be right, it might be not. The writers give just enough ambiguity for the audience to do the work themselves.
A flashback example that probably haunts many children of a certain generation. In Toy Story 2, Jessie recounts how her former owner grew out of playing with her.
This is a devastating concept in and of itself. But the efficiency of the execution makes it all the more powerful.
The song is obviously hugely responsible for making this a powerful montage. But there is also an efficiency with the imagery that makes this scene powerful and effective. Every image conveys a great deal.
All these images do a lot with a little. We don’t need much exposition to explain the situation. We can read between the lines.
Not only are these effective flashbacks but it’s a very effective montage overall. It shows how each image within a montage needs to be carefully curated to have the best effect possible as a whole.
Wild features flashbacks in quite a traditional and well-tread way.
As Cheryl walks the Pacific Trail, there are clues into her past. These are clues as to what has led Cheryl to this point. What is she walking this trail for? What is she running away from or what is she seeking resolve for?
However, the familiarity of how these flashbacks manifest doesn’t make them any less effective. Moreover, the way these flashbacks feature show how to dynamically convey characterisation when there is a limitation to the action and settings
This flashback example again (similar to Money Heist) shows how to elongate tension in a narrative. Dips into her past prolong Cheryl’s journey.
Therefore, her journey overall feels more complete and consistently nourishing for the audience.
In The Social Network, flashbacks are key in bringing court proceedings to life. Whilst there is drama present within the court proceedings themselves, realisations of what is being described make the story more watchable.
Two hours of action restricted to one court room couldn’t possibly lend itself to the dynamism that The Social Network ultimately does.
Furthermore, flashbacks help illustrate all sides of the story.
However, even this reality is ambiguous. By making it clear that we are seeing different perspectives, the point that the truth means different things to different people resonates.
Who are these flashbacks from the perspective of? Whose flashbacks are more trustworthy than others? These questions are mired in ambiguity because of the balance in the variety of flashbacks we see.
Genre-blending is an exciting way to tell stories. It combines multiple genres to create something…
Dialogue is a cornerstone of storytelling. It brings characters to life. Every word spoken in…
Subtext is pivotal in elevating a story’s dialogue, taking it beyond the mere surface-level conversation.…
Crafting a gripping fight scene is no small feat. It demands action, emotion, and storytelling…
Writing a TV show script requires a strong balance of creativity and structure. A good…
Writing a script treatment is an essential step in the development process of any screenplay…
Download 10 x FREE eBooks
View Comments
If you would like to obtain a great deal from this article then you have to apply thеse strategies to your won webloց.
Woᴡ, that's what I wаs exploring for, what
a data! existing here at this blog, thanks admin of this web
site.
Interesting that you include one TV show but not the one with the greatest flashbacks ever: The West Wing.
These are really REALLY really good current examples. Thank you!!! Was easy to picture the scenes even if I hadn't seen them in a while.
These are really REALLY really good current examples. Thank you!!!
Amazing, but how in the hell are The Arrival and Inception not on here???? Amazing movies with amazing and important flashbacks, especially The Arrival.
I have the first act in a screenplay with a dual protagonist. Basically, a carer (secondary protagonist) drops off an orphan (main protagonist) to an orphanage then disappears. The orphan relates to the matron how and why he is brought there. It's the series of events told in flashback and narration that circles back to the arrival of the orphan to the orphanage at the end of act one.
My question is, in the retelling principally from the POV of the main protagonist, I have three scenes where the carer is in the same time and place but not with the orphan, One small scene where she is at home before she returns to pick up the orphan. Acts 2 and three then continue in a linear narrative for both dual protagonists. I am pretty The Irishman was like this. De Niro as an older man is telling the story in a series of flashbacks but it goes off into scenes with other characters where he is not present.
That sounds like an awesome screenplay! You said you had a question but I couldn't really see one. Your idea sounds great, just remember that as your flashback is narrated by a character that the information they can recall is limited to their viewpoint. The only issue I can see cropping up is what you allude to, where the orphan is not present but seems to have knowledge of events. You can workaround this stylistically, or you can leave that awareness out if you can expect the viewer to fill in the gaps (e.g. the orphan and carer were friends for years and had intimate knowledge of what happened) but in general I would recommend against having the protagonist knowing something they shouldn't.
If you want the same flashback but want a workaround then when asked about her experience by the matron the orphan could simply say nothing and then you cut to the flashback. That way there is no suggestion she is narrating it, and then when you return to the scene continue as if it was completely narrated, but the audience is shown something that neither character was witness to.
Most informative. Thank you.